Previous Page  9 / 16 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 9 / 16 Next Page
Page Background

9

Some clear policy prescriptions

One speaker who focused on that nexus was UBS

Center Advisory Board member Harald Uhlig from

the University of Chicago.

In his talk, he argued that regulators in risky coun-

tries – like Greece – have an incentive to allow their

banks to hold home risky bonds and risk defaults,

while regulators in safe countries – like Germany –

will impose tighter regulation. As a result,

When asked by conference attendee Swiss TV (SRF),

what he would advise Europe’s leaders for the

then-ongoing negotiations with the Tsipras govern-

ment, Uhlig’s position was clear: For the sake of the

system, they should take a hard line, force Greece

to comply with the rules, and should not allow for

a debt write-down before reforms. Clearly a view

that his compatriot in the German finance ministry

seemed to have shared wholeheartedly.

"governments in risky countries get

to borrow more cheaply, effectively

shifting the risk of some of the po-

tential sovereign default losses on

the European Central Bank."

Dialogue and Events

Academic Conference

Academic Conference on "The Eco-

nomics of Sovereign Debt"

In the midst of this summer’s Greek debt

crisis, the UBS Center organized a two-day

conference on "The Economics of Sovereign

Debt" on its own premises in Zurich. The

conference took place on June 23−24 and

was attended by over 60 specialists from

universities, central banks, and other institu-

tions (such as the IMF and UBS).

The numerous presentations by researchers and pol-

icymakers featured their latest findings, which both

in terms of methodologies and focus themes covered

a lot of ground. Ranging from theory papers to

purely empirical contributions, presentation topics

included debt restructuring options, the effect of

financial liberalization, a history of haircuts, or the

nexus between sovereign, bank, and private debt.

Shared insights

Amidst this diversity, a set of common themes and

general insights emerged. Rather unexpectedly,

there was widespread agreement on the detrimental

effects of very high levels of sovereign debt (for a

dissenting view, please refer to the research feature

on Hans-Joachim Voth in this newsletter, which

discusses positive effects of high debt levels). Also, it

was widely acknowledged that there is much room

for improvement, both in terms of how sovereign

debt problems are modelled in economic theory as

well as in terms of the existing databases for ana-

lyzing these problems. Finally, as far as Europe is

concerned, one unifying theme was the key impor-

tance of the nexus between the monetary union and

government debt.

At one of the presentations in the UBS Center’s seminar room

Harald Uhlig who spoke on "Sovereign Default Risk and Banks in a

Monetary Union"